Magistrates Training: Why to Crave for More Creative Cities and Judges?

AutoreGilson Jacobsen - João Batista Lazzari
CaricaDoctor in Legal Science by Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, UNIVALI (Brazil) - Doctor in Legal Science by Universidade do Vale do Itajaí-UNIVALI (Brazil)
Pagine152-171
ARTICLES & ESSAYS
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2531-6133/8467
UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA LAW REVIEW
ISSN 2531-6133
[VOL.3:2 2018]
This article is released under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
152
Magistrates Training: Why to Crave for More Creative Cities and Judges?
GILSON JACOBSEN & JOÃO BATISTA LAZZARI
TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Introduction; 2. Challenges for the Judiciary and Training of
Magistrates; 3. Urban Development; 4. Judicial Creativity; 5. Final Considerations.
ABSTRACT: This study seeks to identify the contemporary challenges of the judiciary and
the need for training of judges focused on skills aimed at resolving these adversities. To
demonstrate this approach, it points out the importance of judicial creativity in face of
the disorderly urban development with the exclusion of the poorest people. The study
concludes that the Magistrate's Judicial Schools for Training and Improvement have
the role of establishing training activities that combine legal techniques with
knowledge of management, socioeconomics and creativity. The paper also encourages
socio-judiciary research programs and exchanges with universities, so that judges are
encouraged to enroll in Master and Doctoral courses, and possibly attend a second
graduation.
KEYWORDS: Magistracy; Formation; Competencies; Creativity; Urban Development
University of Bologna Law Review
[Vol.3:2 2018]
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2531-6133/8467
153
1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that there is - or at least must
exist - a relationship between the development of cities and the judges who
live and work there, especially in these times which involve complex and great
challenges to be faced by all, especially by the Judiciary, which primarily
resolves social conflicts, reconciles the parties or says how the legal system
should be applied in each case.
More than this, this work faces the burning theme of judicial creativity
and the humanistic and pragmatic formation of magistrates, trying to
understand if this is something that should be sought in these times when
even more creativity is charged from the cities.
Therefore, the study is structured into three topics. The first provides a
brief notion of some challenges faced by the Judiciary in recent times and the
skills that magistrates develop in training. The second investigates how the
idea of urbanism was raised and discusses some challenges also faced in
relation to urban development. The third identifies any relationship that may
exist between the cities and the judges nowadays. After all, people believe that
a judge must be one who is active in his community, so that he can know it
better and thus give fairer judgments. More than that, the third topic deals
with the issue of judicial creativity, thematic that comes back to approach the
theme of cities, since much is proclaimed nowadays, that cities, in addition to
sustainable, must also be creative.
In the end, what is really going to be discussed is how to select and
train more creative judges in these times when even from the cities, creativity
is expected.
The research, data treatment and drafting of this research report are
based on the deductive method,1 and the techniques used are those from the
Gilson Jacobsen is Doctor in Legal Science by Universidade do Vale do Itajaí UNIVALI (Brazil);
Doctor in Public Law from the University of Perugia / Italy. He is currently attending a post-
Doctorate in Constitutional Law at the University of Bologna, Italy. Federal Judge in Brazil. João
Batista Lazzari is Doctor in Legal Science by Universidade do Vale do Itajaí-UNIVALI (Brazil);
Doctor in Public Law from the University of Perugia (Italy). He is currently attending a post-
Doctorate in Constitutional Law at the University of Bologna, Italy. Federal Judge in Brazil.
1 “DEDUCTIVE METHOD: logical basis of the scientific research dynamics that consists in
establishing a general formulation, and then pick up the phenomenon parts in order to sustain the

Per continuare a leggere

RICHIEDI UNA PROVA

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT