Using Intuitionistic Logic as a Basis for Legal Ontologies

Autore:Edward Hermann Haeusler - Valeria de Paiva - Alexandre Rademaker
Carica:Associate Professor at PUC-Rio, Brazil - Computer Scientist at Rearden Commerce, Forster City, CA - Professor at EMAP/Getulio Vargas Foundation, Brazil.
Pagine:289-297
RIEPILOGO

1. Introduction - 2. Jurisprudence and Intuitionism - 3. Intuitionistic Description Logic iALC- 4. Private International Law Using iALC - 5. Conclusions

 
ESTRATTO GRATUITO
Using Intuitionistic Logic as a Basis for Legal Ontologies
EDWARD HE RMA NN HA EUS LE R, VALER IA DE PAIVA
ALEX AN DRE RA DE MAK ER
SUMM ARY:1. Introduction – 2. Jurisprudence and Intuitionism – 3. Intuitionistic
Description Logic – 4. Private International Law Using – 5. Conclusions
1. INT RODU CT ION
Classical Description Logic has been widely used as a basis for ontology
creation and reasoning in many knowledge specific domains. These specific
domains naturally include Legal Artificial Intelligence. As in any other do-
main, consistency is an important issue for legal ontologies. However, due
to their inherently normative feature, coherence (consistency) in legal on-
tologies is more subtle than in other domains. Consistency, or absence of
logical contradictions, seems more difficult to maintain when more than one
law system can judge a case. This is called a conflict of laws. There are some
legal mechanisms to solve these conflicts, some of them stating privileged
fori, other ruling jurisdiction, etc. In most of the cases, the conflict is solved
by admitting a law hierarchy or a law precedence. Even using these mecha-
nisms, coherence is still a major issue in legal systems. Each layer in this le-
gal hierarchy has to be consistent. Since consistency is a direct consequence
of how one deals with logical negation, negation is also a main concern of
legal systems.
Negation and subsumption play a central role in ontologycoherence. An
adequate intuitionistic semantics for negation in a legal domain comes to the
fore when we take legally valid individual statements as the inhabitants of
our legal ontology. This allows us to elegantly deal with particular situa-
tions of legal coherence, such as a conflict of laws, as those solved by Private
International Law analysis. This paper briefly presents our version of In-
tuitionistic Description Logic, called for Intuitionistic ( being
the canonical classical description logic system). We also discuss the jurispru-
dence foundation of our system, and show how wecan per form a coherence
analysis of “Conflict of Laws in Space” by means of our system . This
E.H. Haeusler is Associate Professor at PUC-Rio, Brazil; V.de Paiva is a computer Scien-
tist at Rearden Commerce, Forster City,CA; A. Rademaker is a Professor at EMAP/Getulio
Vargas Foundation,Brazil.

Per continuare a leggere

RICHIEDI UNA PROVA